← Writing

The Possessed Critic: Reading Soyinka After Midnight

criticism — 2025

It was past midnight when I first understood what Soyinka meant by the Fourth Stage. Not intellectually — I had understood that for years — but viscerally, in the way one understands a thunderstorm only when standing inside it. The book lay open on my desk, spine cracked beyond repair. *Myth, Literature, and the African World.* A title that promises everything and delivers something stranger: not an explanation, but an invocation. Soyinka does not theorise myth. He performs it. And so the question that has haunted my reading ever since: is criticism a form of possession? When we write about another's work, do we enter it — or does it enter us? I think of the Yoruba concept of *ase* — the force that makes things happen, that turns word into event. The critic, at her best, channels *ase*. At her worst, she merely describes its absence.